Quantcast
Channel: John Brown's Public Diplomacy Press and Blog Review
Viewing all 8637 articles
Browse latest View live

Respect is earned, not given, Franklin Cudjoe

$
0
0

Kwarteng, Francis, ghanaweb.com

Cudjoe image from
Excerpt:
[T]he founding president of IMANI, Franklin Cudjoe, recently denounced the disrespectful conduct of a minority Scottish MPs reportedly toward President Mahama and his entourage. Cudjoe was reported to have said on radio: “I do not understand what it is with our missions in the UK. If they had done extensive calculations, they would have been able to determine whether that visit to the Scottish Parliament was needed at all.” ...
Clearly, Cudjoe’s radio interview is characteristic of a heavy truckload of carefully arranged orthographic matrix of trailing words, phrases, and sentences. There is however a bit of an uncreative attempt on his part to casualize a supposedly serious diplomatic gaffe by giving it a curious if unstrategic facelift in the sphere of public diplomacy. ...

Sodastream campaign scores public diplomacy victory

$
0
0

globes.co.il

image from article

A video showing Jews and Arabs working together in a Negev factory has garnered millions of views in the Arab world.

Three weeks ago, 74 employees were fired from the Sodastream factory. The terminations were part of the transfer of the factory from the Palestinian territories to Rahat due to the international pressure from the BDS movement.

The factory was essential to the company’s belief in coexistence and communication, but when Israel did not extend the work permits for the Palestinians, they were forced to leave. Now it appears the unsympathetic story has an optimistic twist in the form of a campaign released by the company in Arab countries.

As part of its marketing, Sodastream created a campaign to show the cooperation between Arabs and Jews in the factory. In its initial phase, the company posted several untranslated versions to Facebook. But after requests from the Swedish and Jordanian embassies – which wanted to use it for their public diplomacy efforts – Sodastream translated the clips to English and Arabic and paid for their promotion.

When the video was met with positive responses in Jordan, it raised the notion of publishing the campaign in other Arab states. The campaign was allocated a million shekels, and Sodastream turned to Google to effectively target the campaign in those countries.

The campaign began airing two weeks ago in the Arab world, in countries like Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Saudi Arabiam and Kuwait. There have been more than 2.4 million views in those countries, garnering both positive and negative responses.

Sodastream spokesperson Maayan Nave said: “Coexistence, fraternity, and diversity are showcased in the video ‘Sodastream – an island of peace’ which was filmed at the Sodastream industrial complex in the Negev, and they are essential to the reality and to the values at the core of Sodastream.

“The video has accumulated more than 35 million views in social media platforms across the world and generated interest from global media outlets; it has even been used for diplomacy by Israeli embassies worldwide. We decided to invest in promoting the video in Arab countries, in which we have no commercial operations, to provide a different visual in the media landscape.”

Cheers for Israeli diplomacy

$
0
0

Norman A. Bailey, globes.co.il

image (not from article) from

While Israel's public diplomacy is a disaster, its official diplomacy in the Arab world, Asia, Africa and Russia has scored notable successes.

The "Jerusalem Post's" March 4th Magazine Section's "Hot Off the Arab Press" feature contained an article which appeared in the February 27th issue of Al-Bayan, an Emirati publication. Among other very interesting things, the article stated the following:

"Much has been said and written in recent weeks about the governmental changes we made...--the appointment of a Minister of Happiness, Tolerance and the Future as well as a 22-year old Minister of Youth, both of whom are women. ... The events around us remind us, time and again, that tolerance is the key to development. ... For hundreds of years we have coexisted with Christians and Jews in the lands we came to inhabit."

This would have been surprising enough were it not for the fact that the article was written by none other than Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum, Emir of Dubai and Prime Minister of the United Arab Emirates!

This extraordinary essay by the leader of one of the most important member countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) points up a fundamental factor of Israeli strength that is strangely overlooked--Israeli diplomacy.

It is well known that the economic and financial situation Israel finds itself in is very good; truly excellent if compared to the great majority of the world's countries: good GDP growth, low inflation and unemployment, a budget surplus and much-needed export diversification from Europe and the US to south Asia and the Far East. In science and technology Israel, a tiny country of eight million people, is second only to the United States, ahead of such giants as the EU, Russia, China and India. A recent survey listed Israel eighth in the world in military strength and Israeli security and intelligence services are the envy of other countries. Psychologically, Israelis are among the happiest of the world's people, despite being located in its most dangerous and chaotic region, and suffering from a dysfunctional political system and serious social problems.

What has been overlooked are the serial triumphs of Israeli diplomacy in recent years. In saying this, a distinction must be made between diplomacy as such and public diplomacy (national public relations) which has been a dismal failure. On the official side, however, great strides have been made in relations with the Sunni Arab world, including the GCC countries, Jordan and Egypt, in ways both public and confidential. Relations with Asia and Africa have never been better and very skillful management of the relationship with Russia has resulted in cooperation with reference to air operations over Syria and the agreement on the part of the Russian government to cancel delivery of advanced anti-aircraft systems to Iran because of the fact that the Iranians were trying to transfer this equipment to Hezbollah. Even the leaders of Sudan and Turkey, after years of anti-Israel agitation, have recently indicated a desire to improve relations.

Israeli diplomacy is carried out by many ministries and agencies of the government, including of course the Ministry of Foreign Affairs but also by several other ministries, as well as by the IDF and the security and intelligence agencies. From top to bottom, the Israeli government and its permanent bureaucracy are to be congratulated. Many countries now look to Israel for agricultural, water management, health and medical assistance, as well as the defense, security and intelligence cooperation already mentioned. In boxing above its weight, Israel is unparalleled in the world. Those responsible are among the true heroes of the present.

Norman A. Bailey, Ph.D., is Professor of Economics and National Security, The National Security Studies Center, University of Haifa, and Adjunct Professor of Economic Statecraft, The Institute of World Politics, Washington, DC. He was formerly with the US National Security Council and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

Cultural and Sports Diplomacy in the North

$
0
0

thearcticinstitute.org

image from

Janelle Trowbridge, Arctic Youth Ambassador, Nome, Alaska, United States March 24, 2016

Analysis by Mieke Coppes


Video: Janelle Trowbridge

The future of the North will be determined by the choices, aspirations, and priorities of its youth. The Youth Perspectives Series is a publishing platform for students to voice their opinions, share their experiences, and influence the debate about their homeland. The forum features articles, videos, illustrations, poems, and multimedia projects created by youth living in the Arctic on the issues that matter to them most. Hosted by The Arctic Institute (TAI), Youth Perspectives is produced in partnership with Students on Ice, Arctic Youth Ambassadors, and the Arctic Adaptation Exchange. The installment below is the second of many throughout 2016 that will be featured on the TAI’s forthcoming new website.

If you are a student living in the Arctic and are interested in publishing with us, or if your organization would like to partner with or sponsor Youth Perspectives, please contact our Managing Director atvictoria.herrmann@thearcticinstitute.org.

Located in Northwest Alaska, Nome is a small port community on Norton Sound of the Bering Sea. This is the community where 18-year-old Janelle Trowbridge got her start in dog-mushing. “I started mushing in April of my 8th grade year. We originally started with ten Greenlandic Huskies. They are stubborn, tough, slow and steady dogs. The next year we got a team of older racing dogs and got involved with local Nome races. Those dogs taught us more than we taught them. My dad, Rolland Trowbridge, caught the racing fever and I was right with him. We bought some dogs from Anchorage mushers and I ended up racing in two Jr. Iditarod’s, earning 6th and 5th place. I like mushing because it teaches so much. You have to learn how to be alpha of your dogs and maintain connections with them. You learn how to prepare and care for yourself and the dogs against the elements. After many hours of training, flipped sleds, tangled lines and guidance from other experienced mushers, I can now silently coast through the sunsets and under the stars with the company of my team”.


Analysis by Mieke Coppes

Dog sledding is often no longer seen as the most viable and accessible mode of transportation in the North. Yet, there is potential for this cultural mode of transportation to blossom into a method of building better relationships between Northern nations.

Public diplomacy, which is the diplomacy of influencing, informing, and understanding the public of another nation,  involves above all else the process of intercultural relations. It is key that we move away from the focus on state to state relations and instead emphasize the forming and building of bonds between people. This fairly new type of diplomacy, which was re-coined in 1958 but first used in 1856, shows a new, more modern way of relating to each other. No longer is formal, or traditional diplomacy, the only way in which international ties can be built – insteadt relations between the average everyday person becomes the focus of this type of diplomacy. Within the ranks of public diplomacy, there are many types that can further be investigated. Both sports diplomacy and cultural diplomacy are examples of this – Just think back to the last Olympics, World Cup, or international sporting event that was broadcast around the world. Not only do these events give the world an opportunity to see the best of a country – as the host country can truly display to the world their home – but more importantly it gives the audience a chance to connect with other audience members from around the world. Fans get to meet each other, have a beer together, discuss a shared passion, and maybe even learn the similarities between their nations. Furthermore, the organizers of these events often work in collaboration with other countries, in particular those who have already held the event and can offer advice on how to overcome the logistical challenges

In the north, dog sledding is transitioning from a form of transportation to a social form of international relations.  Dog sledding has long held an important role in the cultural and life of northerners. In the north, it was the key method of transportation, which led to hunting opportunities and the opportunity to travel.  In a land where horses could not survive and where motorized vehicles have limited purpose, dog sledding allows for a transportation otherwise impossible. Nunavut recognized the cultural significance of Canadian Inuit Dog as the official animal of the territory. This was a sign to show that world of the importance that sled dogs had in shaping and maintaining a lifestyle in the north.

Building on the history of sports diplomacy, dog mushing has the opportunity to become the sport in the north that forms bonds and builds relationships. The changing role of dog mushing is due to the transforming landscape and the efficiency of snowmobiling. Thus, although the days of dogsledding as a key form of transportation may be fading, it is poised to become a form of cultural and sports diplomacy in the North. This shows that while many people may think that international relations are only developed behind closed doors in national capitals or at the United Nations, public diplomacy, and specifically sports and cultural diplomacy, show that this is not the case.

The Importance of Sports Diplomacy
Diplomacy plays a critical role in the world of today.  But the way diplomacy is being done, as was already mentioned, has shifted due to the changing landscape of our international society. In the past, diplomacy was done between the nobility, behind closed doors, surrounded by pomp and circumstance. Today, with the increase of public transportation, with the 24-hour media cycle, and with the internet, the international connections that people have bypasses the elite entirely. The everyday, ordinary person can make connections abroad, and furthermore has the ability to influence policy makers.

The recent Arctic Games, held in Nuuk from March 6-11th is another great example of Northern sports diplomacy. This was an opportunity for athletes, journalists, and tourists, to experience not only the culture of Greenland, but of the North as a whole, to celebrate what it means to be a northerner and to show the world the unique traditions of northern peoples. The Arctic Games not only involved 1,500 athletes from numerous countries, but it also hosted more than 100 journalists, who bring stories, memories, and connections home with them when they leave.

Former United States Ambassador to Denmark, H.E. Jim Cain, emphasized the importance of sports diplomacy at the 2nd Hague Conference on Diplomacy in 2009: “Sports can be a powerful medium to reach out and build relationships . . . across cultural and ethnic divides, with a positive message of shared values: values such as mutual respect, tolerance, compassion, discipline, equality of opportunity and the rule of law. In many ways, sports can be a more effective foreign policy resource than the carrot or the stick.” The 2008 Olympics in Beijing can be seen as the country’s ‘coming out’ party, where the world’s perspective on China was meant to be shaped by the success and forward thinking of the country at the time; China was to be seen as a rising, modern, economic powerhouse. People around the world not only traveled to China to partake in the celebration, but the eyes of the world were on China and their ability to create a connection with the citizens of the world. This is the power of sports diplomacy.

The Importance of Cultural Diplomacy
Today’s dog mushing is also a type of cultural diplomacy, which may best be described as, “a course of actions, which are based on and utilize the exchange of ideas, values, traditions and other aspects of culture or identity, whether to strengthen relationships, enhance socio-cultural cooperation or promote national interests; Cultural diplomacy can be practiced by either the public sector, private sector or civil society.” Because of the past of dog mushing, and the implications of northern culture within the sport, it also becomes a means of cultural diplomacy.

Cultural diplomacy is important because it encourages countries and their people to give another nation the benefit of the doubt on specific policy issues or requests for collaboration since there is a presumption of shared interest. When connections are built, either on shared experiences and culture, such as dog mushing between northern nations, or when new cultures experience dog mushing, such as peoples from England, Argentina, or Japan (all of whom have participated in the US dog race the Iditarod), it allows bonds to be built which can then be used as soft power. Joseph Nye describes soft power well, explaining that co-optive power is the ability to attract through cultural and ideological appeal. Dog mushing allows for soft power, by displaying shared northern culture specifically to other northern countries, by emphasizing the shared, communal, historical aspect of transportation.

The Iditarod and the Finnmarksløpet
The Iditarod may be the most famous dog sled race, recreating the harrowing journey to deliver diphtheria serum to the town of Nome, known to many as “The Last Great Race on Earth.” The Iditarod has always beckoned to a variety of people, including international mushers; the last international winner was a Norwegian named Robert Sørlie in 2005. Although the Iditarod has never played up the importance of international connections, it does allow people around the world to experience what it means to be in Alaska, what the history of this northernmost state is, and most importantly a chance to see not only the stunning landscape, but the people who inhabit this desolate world. Ned Cathers, a competitor in the race, explains that the race is becoming more international, he even hosted a Jamaican who was training to compete in the Iditarod.

This year saw ten foreigners, the highest number ever, competing in the race. The stories of these international competitors speaks to the draw of this race and its ability to display both cultural and sports diplomacy. Many have heard tales of the Iditarod, dreaming of competing for years, and save up thousands of dollars for the honour of competing at what is known as the ‘Super Bowl’ of the dog mushing world. The ability to share and experience the North is not limited to the people who attend these races. Indicative of as much, the Discovery Channel created a television series about the 2008 race (now available on Netflix) that allows people around the world to experience, in some form, the communities of the North. More recently, in 2014, Professor John Bailey, rode on the back of a sled so that he could capture the Iditarod for Google Street View. The draw of such an international race, allows for the sharing of these stories, and with new media, the real life experiences of Northerners can be shared around the world.

It is not only the older generations who are using dog mushing to explain who they are and share their culture, but also the next generations. Using new technologies, they are already sharing their experiences. Janelle, a Arctic Youth Ambassador from Nome, Alaska, has made a youtube video about her life and career as a musher. She has already competed in two Jr. Iditarod races and will, in all likelihood,  be seen in some of the longer races in the future. Her video shows in a very real way the impact that sports can have in making a connection and in sharing an experience from a fairly remote community to the entire world. Sunniva, a thirteen year old living in Norway, is also looking towards the future and competing in the Finnmarksløpet, as well as potentially the Iditarod. With many of the experienced mushers already competing in more than one of the large competitions, it is not uncommon to see cross-border friendships being built.

These three examples display the importance of new media in both cultural and sports diplomacy. The Internet has changed the way that transmitting information is possible, lowering costs and allowing people to gain traction and power by bypassing traditional centers of information. Even today, the power of the Internet is not completely understood; to fully understand how our world works with these new types of technology will take more research, study, and debate. What we do know is that the Internet allows people around the world to share their stories, their lives, and their cultures in new ways. And this changes the way human history is being shaped and developed, there are new abilities in how we can develop a global story, one that connects the world by showing us who we are as one group.

The United States is not the only country promoting dog mushing for cultural and sports diplomacy purposes. In fact, there are numerous long distance dog sled races, including but not limited to Canada and the United States’ Yukon Quest, Russia’s Beringia Sled Dog Race, and Norway’s Finnmarksløpet. There is an increasing focus on connecting dog sled races from multiple countries and increasing the international traffic at the dog sledding events. Furthermore, these races honour the bond between humans and animals while focusing on a key cultural element of living in the North.

The Finnmarksløpet is also pushing to become more international, with this year's winner being the first-non Norwegian to ever win the race. Petter Karlsson, a Swede, won against competition from Norway, Sweden, the UK, Scotland, Germany, and Finland. Not only are there more international participants, but the Finnmarksløpet itself is looking to cross the Atlantic Ocean and foster better relations with the United States by working together with the Iditarod. Per Aronsen, the chairman of the Finnmarksløpet, took a trip to Alaska late last year to discuss deeper relations between the Norwegian race and the Iditarod. By attempting to work together and bringing more Alaska mushers to Norway by means of shared passions, there is an opportunity to build international relations at the interpersonal level.

This is not the first connection that the Finnmarksløpet has made with a different country’s dog race. TheArctic Alps Cup is a cross-border competition that adds points received from both the Finnmarksløpet and La Grande Odyssée, a dog race in the French and Swiss Alps, and then awards 5,000 Euro to the three top mushers. This type of competition encourages mushers to experience both races, and thereby experience both countries, cultures, and peoples. The Yukon Quest is but another example, with the added bonus that the races literally crosses international borders. This race starts in Fairbanks, Alaska and ends in Whitehorse, Yukon. Not only does the race involve mushers from both countries, take place in both countries, but the staff are also from both Canada and the United States. This opportunity to further deepen a bond between two neighbours is one of the benefits of such an event. Canada and the United States have great diplomatic ties, of course, but such a race can show other nations the benefits of using dog sled races to further cultural diplomacy.

Finally there are several international associations that help foster relationships between mushers. TheInternational Sled Dog Racing Association (ISDRA) organizes and encourages mushers to travel to numerous dog mushing events around the world. They represent over 120 races in Canada, the United States, and even Japan. Another example is the International Federation of Sledding Sports (IFSS), which focuses on sledding both on snow and dryland. When the IFSS was first formed the Council members included countries such as Canada, France, the US, Norway, and Germany. Furthermore, the headquarters have been in both the United States and Brussels, allowing for the employment of a wide range of nationalities.

Dog mushing is clearly an example of both sports and cultural diplomacy happening in the north. No longer is it seen as simply a mode of transportation, but more and more it is becoming a way of connecting northern countries.. These new forms of diplomacy are reshaping the way that stories are being told, and youth are at the forefront of shaping how public diplomacy will be seen in the future. Governments, NGOs, citizens, and sports organizations, are utilizing the benefits of public diplomacy to foster relationships and build bridges in a constantly shifting international world. Making connections with people, and not only other governments, may be the key to wielding soft power, which in the end can mean the difference between peace and war.

PD Magazine Winter 2016 Issue: Sub-Saharan Africa

$
0
0

uscpublicdiplomacy.org

uncaptioned image from entry
Mar 24, 2016
Public Diplomacy Magazine (PD Mag) announces the release of its Winter 2016 issue: “Sub-Saharan Africa.” The latest edition is the first regional issue, showcasing the practice and possibilities of public diplomacy in Africa.
Sarah Valeria Salceda, Editor-in-Chief, writes: "The remnants of colonization have created a popular conception of Africa as a continent ravaged by poverty, starvation, and war; a region consistently being aided by the wealthy West. However, the twenty first century has seen a grand stand against this impression."
This issue presents case studies highlighting both the successes and failures of public diplomacy efforts in Sub-Saharan Africa, and features pieces on various forms of film diplomacy, the NBA’s sports diplomacy, and an examination of China’s public diplomacy efforts in sub-Saharan Africa, among other key examples.
The endnote of the 15th issue of PD Mag is a piece written by USC School of International Relations professor Douglas Becker, titled "Justifying Paul Kagame: Genocide, Trauma, Historical Memory and Public Diplomacy" and offers a glimpse into the Summer 2016 issue: "Crisis Diplomacy."

Meet the Author: Daniel Whitman

$
0
0

uscpublicdiplomacy.org

Whitman image from entry
Mar 26, 2016
Daniel Whitman is Assistant Professor of Foreign Policy at American University's School of International Service. He is the author, most recently, of Outsmarting Apartheid: An Oral History of South Africa's Cultural and Educational Exchange with the United States, 1960-1999 (2014). Whitman worked in the Senior Foreign Service at the U.S. Department of State from 1985-2009, including several years in South Africa.
Outsmarting Apartheid makes a strong case for the soft power value of educational exchange. But these programs have such a slow return on investment, and may not seem very glamorous to young public diplomats. Why should PD practitioners get excited about educational exchange?
I have yet to meet a PD officer – young or old – who does not see glamour in educational exchange. These programs always have been the jewel in the crown of PD, and will remain so as long as funding permits.
Why is your book crucial reading for students of public diplomacy?
Your question asks for immodesty, which I will duck. Outsmarting Apartheid stands as a record of what can be done through persistence and personal commitment in a challenging context. With the interviewees now already beginning to pass on, the record remains, of their achievements and of the benefits of determined PD programs over decades of adversity.
What surprised you in conducting your research for the book?
I was taken aback by the uniformity of accounts of the personal benefits from USG exchange programs in South Africa during the apartheid regime: rich and poor, as well as ethnically diverse accounts all noted the concept of, “When I arrived at JFK airport in New York, I saw that all things are possible.” There was remarkable similarity of this type of observation.
You began working in South Africa in the 1970s, and went on to become the Program Development Officer at the U.S. Embassy in Pretoria. For those who've never had the opportunity to travel there, can you explain why South Africa has such a special place in your heart? 
How is South Africa special? Well, perhaps any location inspires affection after four years of effort. Aside from my personal sense of achievement, I also appreciated the immense diversity, humor, daring, and gutsiness of South Africans. Recognizing their stark differences, all pitched in during the 1995-99 period, to make the best possible success of a rare historic opportunity. “E Pluribus Unum” has a special meaning in this country of sunlight, risk, exhilaration and sense of shared history.

Honored to host my old boss at FSI today.

$
0
0

from linkedin, March 24, 2016

Honored to host my old boss at FSI today.

Honored to host my old boss at FSI today.

Ongoing updating of article, "Diplomacies, from Public to Pubic" (planned as a biweekly update)

$
0
0

"Diplomacies, from Public to Pubic," Huffington Post (3/23/2016)

A comment on the above-cited HP article by scholar
Nicholas John Cull· Professor at USC Annenberg School for Communication:
John Brown raises valid concerns here. While it is not surprising that the concept of diplomacy has broadened since the days of Sir Harold Nicolson (after all the reality has broadened), the x-diplomacy meme needs a certain skepticism and not all its forms deserve the same regard for being a 'thing'. Moreover, analysts of public diplomacy might be wise to remember the preference of the distinguished writer on the subject Bruce Gregory for speaking of 'diplomacy's public aspects' rather than 'public diplomacy'. We writers in the field need to be mindful of our crutches, contractions and conventions and remember that just using a term does not make it so. Just because we need a headline on 'x-diplomacy' doesn't mean we can't unpack the term as 'the diplomatic aspects of x' in our text.
***
From a kind reader of the HP article:
"[F]ifth grade humor in the title and in one of the paragraphs. ... the inclusion of inappropriate humor."
Note: A "fifth-grade humor" article on this topic -- pubic diplomacy -- was posted by the prestigious USC Center on Public Diplomacy, under the title "Public Diplomacy Goes 'Pubic'" (2007). (Note mention in this piece of Miss Israel 2004, Gal Gadot, starring in the just-released "Batman vs. Superman.")

 Gadot image from

***
Updating began on 3/26/2016; some terms existed before that date


image from


***
Related terms


***
See also

Brian Carlson, "Public Diplomacy Goes Public," Public Diplomacy Council (2003)



image from above article

Read Hillary's Email Search Results -- search words (1) Public Diplomacy (2) McHale [former Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs]

$
0
0

readhillarysemail.com; via TR on Facebook




Search Words (1) Public Diplomacy (477 items) and (2) McHale (596 items) yield some interesting results, from a historical (hysterical?) perspective.


Open Meeting “Zawód Dyplomata”

$
0
0

diplomats.pl


image from entry

EAD [European Academy of Diplomacy] is proud to inform that we have inaugurated the 2016 series of open meetings “Zawód Dyplomata”, addressed to all students interested in diplomacy, international relations, pursuing a career in international organizations and think-tanks. Topic include a number of issues related to diplomacy – diplomatic protocol, international negotiations, international security, leadership, public diplomacy, working with media, public speaking and career in Polish foreign service. If you would like to organize a meeting at your university please contact Ms. Karolina Krzyżanowska: kkrzyzanowska@diplomats.pl. You can also follow our fanpage on Facebook for more details.

Public Diplomacy Efforts with the Chinese for Korean Unification

$
0
0

vankprkorea.wordpress.com [includes video]

image from article

300 years ago, a man from Joseon named Hong Dae-yong traveled to Qing China and met a Chinese scholar in Beijing. It took 56 days on foot to reach his destination. The Chinese scholar’s name was Um Sung and eventually the 2 scholars became good friends. They communicated by exchanging letters which usually took 1 to 2 years to send and receive a single letter.

Today, China and Korea still maintain a strong relationship through tourism, trade, and even for education. China currently is Korea’s top trading partner, accounting for 26% of Korea’s exports. Also, the largest group of international students that go to China are Koreans and vice-versa. Thus, this China-Korea relationship is an important relationship for both countries.

However, with the recent nuclear threats in North Korea, this relationship has gotten weaker. To defend itself from missile attacks from North Korea, South Korea is planning on deploying a missile defense system. However, this defense system does not go well with China and they have threatened to end their good ties with Korea if they persisted on deploying the system.

These issues prove that reunification is key to help establish peace and prosperity within that region. Reunification is also key to help lay out the foundation towards a peaceful Asia.You too can play a part in helping to reach this goal. Help VANK in their goals to reaching reunification and peace!

Bishop J.Y. Adu Must Be Careful With His Words

$
0
0

Come Again, Bishop J.Y. Adu

Adu image from
Excerpt:
[A] well-known fraudulent paranormalist and apocalyptic prophesier who also doubles as an unabashed theological entrepreneur of political and spiritual lies, a man who is always quick to make grandiose political capital out of postdiction is our Rev. Owusu Bempah, a frog-eyed post-exilic eschatologist with a funny murine bleached countenance and seemingly cowered physique. ...
Rev. Owusu Bempah’s prophetic homeopathy amounts to theological and doctrinal pseudoscience. The fact is, Where are these prophetic placebos coming from? These post-exilic eschatologists, who evidently lack a heightened sense of public diplomacy and of expertise in national security matters, behave like a casket- or coffin-maker. ...

From WWII to World Fairs: Remembering Jack Masey

$
0
0

Andrew Wulf, uscpublicdiplomacy.org

Masey image from article
Mar 25, 2016
I first met Jack Masey at the George Washington University event in 2009 that marked the 50th anniversary of the American National Exhibition in Moscow. In August 2010, knee-deep in research for my dissertation on U.S. exhibitions during the Cold War, I arranged a series of interviews with Jack over the course of a few days at his design offices in New York City. My world changed forever after that meeting. As an ice-breaker, I asked him how he handled controversy in his exhibitions. He broke into a broad smile and told me the story of when his firm designed the 1990 reopening of the permanent exhibition at Ellis Island. By request of Turkish authorities who denied the historical record of the Armenian Genocide, Jack and his team reluctantly took down photos referencing that event. Never deterred, only days later he replaced these censored images by even more shocking pictures whose veracity was proven. These images stayed up. Truth (and creativity) won out.
Much has already been written about Jack since his recent passing, and of course I learned during our meeting that Jack had his start in all of this in Patton’s Ghost Army in the European theater of World War II. Jack said: “I was in this group of nuts from the camouflage corps, including Bill Blass (who readVogue in his foxhole), Art Kane, and Ellsworth Kelly. When the war was over, none of us wanted another war. I go to New York, and Bill Blass says, Jack, if you’re looking for work, there’s a job at the Architectural Forum.”

This sort of presentation of America’s message to the world would never have happened without Jack at the helm of the USIA exhibition team.

From studying design at Yale on the GI Bill, to his days at the Forum, to the larger-than-life United States Information Agency exhibitions, Jack was a friend to so many of us. In the words of his wonderful wife and friend Beverly Payeff-Masey, “Jack was a bulldozer.” He knew Khrushchev, Nehru, Bucky Fuller, Charles and Ray Eames, and the Cambridge Seven Associates. He was everywhere at international exhibitions, behind the scenes, clearing the way for brilliant designers and architects to do their work unfettered from government policy wonks and bureaucratic decision-making. This sort of presentation of America’s message to the world would never have happened without Jack at the helm of the USIA exhibition team. During our interviews, Beverly said, “There has to be something centripetal that holds all of this together. Some thread that unifies the content.” For me, in the end, it was Jack himself, his expertise, and his partnering with the world’s greatest designers and architects—in the service of U.S. cultural diplomacy—that made all of this a reality.
For Jack, the Cold War was the perfect stage to win hearts and minds for the United States via creative avenues of marvelous design and architecture. Jack liked to joke that the way these shows came together, from New Delhi in ’55 to the Bicentennial in ’75, was “a series of happy accidents, a series of strange things that took place.” I tend to disagree with him on this one point. Jack prized above all else the power of these events to bring people from different cultures together in order to build bridges all over the world. Jack was a true human being who enjoyed a comprehensive joy for life, friendship, and creativity. Knowing him—my mentor, friend, and visionary—has made me a better one too.

Quotable: Berman and Walzer look back on critiques of Communism

$
0
0

publicdiplomacycouncil.org



image from

Friday, March 25th 2016
“How Western intellectuals turn themselves into the enemies of an entire class of liberal writers from Muslim backgrounds” was the subhead of a March 21, 2016, op-ed by Paul Berman (the critic-at-large of Tablet magazine) and Michael Walzer (emeritus professor at the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton).  “The Daoud Affair” ran on the website of Tablet magazine on March 21, 2016.

The front part of the article related why the Algerian novelist and journalist Kamel Daoud is “threatening to renounce journalism,” and the two authors discerned a pattern of unfair condemnations of liberal ideas expressed by Muslim writers like Daoud, Salman Rushdie, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, and Boualem Sansal.

This retired Public Diplomacy officer, however, found the last half of their article most thought-provoking.  It drew parallels to the contest of ideas during the Cold War.

The two of us who are writing this commentary call attention to a second pattern in these condemnations, which dates to the days of Soviet Communism. Everyone who remembers the history of the 20th century will recall that, during the entire period from the 1920s to the 1980s, one brave and articulate dissident after another in the Soviet bloc succeeded in communicating a message to the Western public about the nature of Communist oppression—valuable messages because the dissidents could describe with first-hand accuracy the Soviet regime and its satellite states.

And, time after time, a significant slice of Western intellectuals responded by crying: “Oh, you mustn’t say such things! You will encourage the reactionaries!” Or they said: “You must be a reactionary yourself. A tool of imperialism.” The intellectuals who responded in these ways were sometimes Communists, pledged to loyalty to the Soviet Union, and sometimes they were fellow-travelers, who defended the Soviet Union without having made any pledges. But sometimes they were merely people who worried about their own societies—who worried that criticism of the Soviet Union was bound to benefit right-wing fanatics in the West. These people considered that, in denouncing the Soviet dissidents, they were protecting the possibility for lucid and progressive conversation in their own countries.

But that was a mistake. By denouncing the dissidents, Western intellectuals succeeded in obfuscating the Soviet reality. And they lent the weight of their own prestige to the Soviet regime, which meant that, instead of being the enemies of oppression, they ended up as the allies of oppression. The progressive intellectuals were not foolish to worry about right-wing fanaticism in their own countries, but they needed to recognize that sometimes political arguments have to be complicated. They needed to learn how to defend the Soviet dissidents even while attacking right-wing fanatics in the West. They needed to make two arguments at the same time.

Students tour Washington, DC over break

$
0
0

dailytrojan.com; see also John Brown, "Hey, buddy, can you spare $81,634 for an MA degree in public diplomacy?"Notes and Essays

On Capitol Hill · (From left to right) Amanda Lester,   Jung-Hwa Kang and Justin Chapman are Master’s of Public Diplomacy students who traveled to Washington, D.C. to network. There they met politicians such as former U.S. Chief of Protocol and White House Social Secretary Capricia Marshall. - Photo courtesy of Justin Chapman



When many students left campus last week for spring break, first-year Master’s of Public Diplomacy students Justin Chapman, Jung-Hwa Kang and Amanda Lester headed to Washington, D.C. for a networking tour of America’s capital.
The trip, which took place from March 14 to March 18, was entirely planned by the students.
It was billed as a “roving conference” where the participants received advice, information and even job opportunities from senior practitioners of public diplomacy to share with their classmates.
An MPD tradition over the last few years, faculty serve only the role of connecting participants with experts in D.C. they could potentially meet or sources of funding that may be available.
In their time in the capital, the MPD students managed to make more than a dozen meetings with high-level officials from the Brookings Institution, the U.S. Department of State and many other organizations while also making time to meet with alumni of the graduate degree program currently living in D.C.
Chapman said that meeting Capricia Marshall, a former U.S. chief of protocol and White House social secretary in the Clinton administration who is currently ambassador-in-residence at the Atlantic Council, was one of their most memorable experiences.
“[Ambassador Marshall] told us to grab every opportunity that we can. If someone asks ‘Who can do this,’ say ‘I can,’ then figure out how to do it,” said Chapman, who is also the project fellow at the Annenberg Center on Communication Leadership and Policy. “Make yourself invaluable.”
Marshall’s advice also stuck with Kang, who is still forming her nascent career goals.
Kang said that it set her free from guilt, reinforced the mindset she had been carrying and inspired her to walk out of her comfort zone.
“People often ask me what my plan is after completing the MPD program,” Kang said in an e-mail to the Daily Trojan. “They sometimes raise their eyebrows when I say that I am still exploring and figuring out my path, since I am learning a lot of new things in  the MPD program.”
The participants plan to share the information they collected in a report that will be internally distributed to students and faculty in the MPD program. The information will also be used to plan next year’s trip.
Along with building a stronger network for graduate students, the trip also has the intent of attracting interest to USC and the public diplomacy program. The participants had the opportunity to talk about their academic experiences thus far.
“We met with undergrads from Syracuse University who were interested in the program,” Chapman said. “The people we met with now have information and knowledge of the program and can recommend it to students.”
This year’s trip, under the auspices of Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism Dean Ernest Wilson III and MPD Director Nicholas Cull, is one of many that seeks to provide public diplomacy students with opportunities for learning and future employment.
“I see the trip as an important part of the transition to the workplace for students in the program, both because it exposes students to potential employers and because it reminds people in the field of the program and its work,” Cull said.
According to Cull, past networking trips have been taken by MPD students to Vietnam, India, China, Indonesia and Brazil.
But the participants swapped the excitement of an international location with a feeling of validation about their career goals.
“This trip opened my eyes to everything that can be done with the skills I’m learning in the MPD program,” Lester said. “Besides receiving helpful career advice at our meetings, it was inspiring to talk to people who are doing public diplomacy every day, facing its challenges, believing in its promise and still searching for answers to the field’s biggest questions.”

India's Public Diplomacy and Our Media

$
0
0

Misha Rahman, pakobserver.net

image (not from article) from

Realist dictum suggests that the struggle for power between states dominate their relations with each other. And for soothing this clash of national interest and the relations full of fractious factors, states use diplomacy towards each other. More precisely, if we talk about the case of India, it had already struggled a lot to show its huge potency in the field of military and defense as well as economic power, yet it is somehow keenly inclined to show its power to the whole world. There is a limit to what “hard power” can achieve, so the mixture of hard and soft power, a newly emerging concept known as “smart power” is highly needed indeed.

In the contemporary IR, the most vital tool for the implementation of soft power has been “Public Diplomacy”. And a lot of it has been done for the enhancement of cultural diplomacy between Pakistan and India by the governments of both countries, in order to ease the tensions and frictions which both countries are holding, because of the fact that both are known as arch rival states since the time of their independence. Both countries have been accusing each other more after the nuclear posturing, with the rising number of complaints for supporting the cross border terrorism and in turn destabilizing the rest of the region.

One of the most important and successful techniques of “public and cultural diplomacy” catching even more attention is the potential of the bollywood films in nourishing the ties between Pakistan and India. Indian cinema has got a tremendous fame in Pakistan and has almost replaced the Pakistani cinema, whereas the films are very much famous among the citizens of the counter side and have been watched with interest. Due to the poor performance of Pakistani film industry, the actors and singers in order to get work and focus on the future of their work turned them towards India, thus giving the Indian film and music industry a chance to enter in the cinema’s of Pakistan.

Same is the case with Indian music. Indian music has a strong influence on the people and is very much liked by them, and the songs of Indian artists and singers can be heard in most of the Pakistani households, in the public transports, in everyone’s personal mobile phones, shopping malls and nonetheless in the backward areas of country. Due to this factor of eminence many Pakistani’s have inclined towards India in order to secure their future, on the same time increasing the interaction in the fields of entertainment. Moreover exchanges of artists and actors have also added a lot to it.

The Pakistanis and Indians share a common culture since the time they were together in the subcontinent under the British rule and it further goes centuries back. Yet there exists a fact that most households in both countries represent the large families, which are populated with the elders having the rigid memories in their minds of the cruel behaviours towards their side by the other one on the basis of ethnic and religious differences. That’s the reason why Muslims in Pakistan are still jumpy not only because the leaders or the ideology are anti-Indians but for the horrible memories and the putrid image they have in their minds.

The same Indian culture is depicted in the dramas which are mostly seen in the Pakistani public on the daily basis and are very much influencing the daily lives of large number of population of Pakistan. On the other hand, media of both countries has played exceptional role in the promotion of negative image and feelings of hostility among both sides. Many Indian and Pakistani dramas and films are based and focused on the building of negative image of the other side, which has played an important role in provoking hatred among the people.

Perhaps the religious diplomacy and the interfaith dialogues between the both sides at the higher levels of the states could be more hopeful as well as helpful. By reducing the hatred towards each other on the religious basis they could find more ways to compete in the economic race and could have more chances to utilize wisely their human capitals.

A long history of mutual distrust, one crisis after another and persuasion of devastating arms race have been determining the relations between both countries for decades. Whereas, official diplomacy has been a failure always due to vague resolutions, without any concrete statements, leaving no room for the strong bilateral ties. Moreover the authorities remained unable to find any common ground to agree upon. On the other hand, people to people, unofficial dialogues between the populations of both countries have emerged in order to establish mutual understanding and for promoting peace on the grounds where governments have failed to make efforts. Citizens of both countries are seen to be more inclined towards building a future free of tensions that are existing currently i.e. peaceful future, while throwing a light to the prominence citizen diplomacy has gained. Any individual can be a citizen diplomat acting as an informal and unofficial representative of the country. Citizen diplomats take part mostly in the activities such as cultural exchange programmes, educational exchange programmes or else engage themselves in the humanitarian activities abroad.

In an ongoing decades-long conflict between the two countries, the diplomacy of citizens has the potential to correct the negative image that has embedded in the minds and to change the thinking about each other through face to face interactions. Citizen diplomacy can be promoted with the help of government through decreasing the visa restrictions, enhancement of public transport for the citizens between Pakistan and India, increasing art, musical, sports and media exchange programmes.

Media is a very strong tool in persuasion of public diplomacy. It can help in promoting the positive image, solidarity and peace among the stacks. But so far unfortunately, media as a whole – either electronic media or print media – is working far away from reality and in a constant struggle to enhance the friction, and thus it is playing a major role in devastating the relationship between the two countries.

Misha is the Fatima Jinnah Women University student doing masters in Defence and Diplomatic Studies)

Email:raza.sadia@yahoo.com

Diplomacy and Death

$
0
0

flcourier.com

image (not from article) from


President Obama is criticized for ‘playing tourist’ during his historic trip to Cuba despite the latest ISIS terror attack, this time at an airport and subway stop in Europe


Excerpt:
Explosions that tore through the departures area at Brussels’ international airport and a subway station in the heart of the Belgian capital Tuesday one hour apart left 31 people dead and 300 injured. ...
Thousands of miles away from Belgium, President Obama ended his historic trip to Cuba with a confident challenge to its communist leaders Tuesday, pressing them to keep pace with the changes he set in motion for a new era in the relationship between the neighboring nations. ...
During his speech, the president pledged support to Belgium.
“This is yet another reminder that the world must unite,” he said. “We must be together, regardless of nationality or race or faith in fighting against the scourge of terrorism.”
The president conferred privately with his national security staff and other world leaders about the international response, but marched on with his day of public diplomacy. ...


Public Diplomacy

$
0
0

Andrés Federman, buenosairesherald.com

image (not from article) from

Hits and misses of a historic visit: Obama meets with great success but made one big mistake

Government supporters as well as its diehard opponents agree in defining the US president’s visit as a complete success. Mauricio Macri’s followers argue that the visit has reconnected Argentina with the world, with the added bonus of the full and explicit endorsement from Barack Obama. And those in the opposition explain that the visit is instrumental to the needs of the world power — and its local ally, Macri — to finally deliver this country into the hands of its imperial masters. The former consider this moment as a blessing, while the latter think it accelerates Argentina’s plunge into very hard and dark times. In their eyes, Obama has — unfortunately for Argentina — succeeded.

A third, more moderate position, is that of those sympathetic to the government who choose to temper their optimism with prudence. They warn that the airplanes full of investors announced by some of Macri’s spokespeople are still in their hangars and their passengers have not as yet packed for the trip.

All three may be partly right, but in all cases, they might be looking at the issue only through the perspective of the immediate political impact — and failing to examine the long term implications for the bilateral relation and standing of the US in Argentina. Not today or next time there is an opinion poll but — at least — a couple of years down the line. Not in short term political impact but in terms of how Joe Public feels about Americans.

In any embassy, improving the long term perceptions about the country they represent is one of the jobs of its Public Diplomacy team. Just as it is their job to expand the network of contacts, not only political but also in terms of trade, investment as well as cultural and scientific cooperation.

Considered from this perspective, an event like President Obama’s visit can be a wonderful opportunity and the best possible tool that a Public Diplomacy team could dream of. But, unfortunately, the reverse is also true. The results of a mistake could have a long term political impact and burn away years of painstaking and resource consuming work.

In all likelihood, by last Saturday personnel at all levels of the US embassy in Buenos Aires were breathing normally again. Obama is gone and, with him, the toughest challenge that an embassy like the American can face: an official visit by its head of state. True, the efforts and toils of all the agencies involved in the protection of the US president were more attractive in terms of media coverage due to their size and high visibility. But the fact is that the long-term impact of the presidential visit will depend on the wisdom qualities and abilities of the embassy’s public diplomacy department. Much in the same way as — in all likelihood — it was the organizer of many of the activities that involved and supported Obama’s presence in Argentina.

True, the embassy team had an advantage: the Obamas are a dream come true for anybody dealing in public diplomacy. They are charismatic, terrific speakers, spontaneous and relate well to their audiences. Moreover, their personal histories vouch for the values they espouse. Their performance with the youngsters — Barack with young entrepreneurs — ranged between very good and perfect. So did the choice of venues, themes and audiences. Full credit to the embassy’s Public Diplomacy team.

However, in the context of such success in terms of delivering good messages, it could be suggested that there was one big mistake which seems attributable to Obama himself or his close circle.

Obama’s celebration of the new times of Macri’s Argentina seems quite overdone. In fact, it sounded as the celebration of a new regime that takes over after a dictatorship. This is not the case. Macri won a democratic election with a slim margin over another candidate — Daniel Scioli — who also has strong democratic credentials. The US president has no business implying anything different about former president Cristina Fernández de Kirchner. The line he took was tantamount to becoming involved in Argentina’s internal affairs. Which is not the done thing.

Some argue that this was Obama’s payback to CFK for her continued attacks at the UN and elsewhere. True as this may be, if he had a problem with CFK he should have addressed her directly. Getting the president into the crossfire could boomerang on Macri.

@andresfederman

Australian opera, ballet, orchestras drawn to the Chinese stage

$
0
0

The Australian (subscription)

image from

[From Google search] Cultural or public diplomacy is about perceptions and influence: we send arts companies to China and other places to show that Australia is a modern, ...

Maybe It's Not Kudzu?

$
0
0

publicdiplomacycouncil.org

Saturday, March 26th 2016
Creative Commons
Backyard Garden photo by Jasper33 via Creative Commons
A previous commentary here unfortunately missed the point about kudzu.  
Sorry, I mean, about the ‘‘Countering Information Warfare Act of 2016.’’  That’s the one recently unveiled by Republican Senator Rob Portman and Democratic Senator Chris Murphy.  The S.2692 bill text is here.
It is worth reading the actual text of the bill, because it describes something quite different from the kudzu that famously “sucks up all the water and nutrients” needed by existing plants (or “funding and support needed by existing government organizations.)”
As I read the bill, it authorizes and funds some things we don’t have right now.  The new center will:
  • coordinate the collection and analysis of information on foreign government information warfare efforts;
  • incorporate data-based analysis of foreign propaganda/disinformation into  U.S. national strategy;
  • synchronize whole-of-government initiatives to expose/counter foreign information operations directed against U.S. national security interests;
  • advance fact-based narratives that support United States allies and interests;
  • share technology and technical expertise among  agencies as well as seeking  help from external sources;
  • identify gaps in United States capabilities.
If anyone thinks we are succeeding at those things right now, please do speak up? 
It’s not obvious that we’re doing a very good job – at the inter-agency level – of countering or even analyzing Russian, Chinese or ISIL propaganda.   
The kudzu commentary worries that such a “counter disinformation center” will come at the expense of  VOA, RFE-RL, RFA, MBN, and OCB.  With international civilian broadcasting already absorbing about one third of total USG spending on public diplomacy, that garden seems well tended. 
And, the State Department’s public diplomacy focus in recent years has done a good job on cultural diplomacy, English teaching, educational exchanges, and long-term relationship building activities worldwide.    
But the endless succession of weeds and crop failures – I mean endless succession of organization charts and leadership turnover in the Counterterrorism Strategic Communication Center (CSCC), Global Engagement Center (GSEC), and other entities – look like symptoms of dysfunction.  Add the apparently unbridgeable gulf  that separates Foggy Bottom, Arlington, Langley, and the West Wing, and it is no wonder that some senators think it’s time to bring in a new gardener.
Oh, and that new gardener? Well, the bill proposes that the chairman of the new center’s steering committee be the Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, not the Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy.

AttachmentSize
Portman-Murphy Counter Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act.pdf36.06 KB

Author: Brian Carlson
Viewing all 8637 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images